The subtle red highlights were not you anyway. You need some hair that will match your personality and make a statement. Have you seen the 1997 film - "The Fifth Element?" Leeloo's hair is for you!
You know John, if it wasn't for the Southern side of the family I would have gone for the LeeLoo look. I love that movie!!!
As for Stu, I try to get him to spike his hair, but he doesn't like that. He definitely won't go for the Ruby look. Too bad. He could have had herds of Japanese school girls following him.
You blog entries bring Burroughs and the posttextual paradigm of discourse to mind.
I thought of this because your entries reflect the work of Semioticist rationalism and cultural discourse. As you know, the main theme of Tilton’s essay on semioticist rationalism is a mythopoetical totality. It could be said that the premise of subtextual dedeconstructivism states that culture is capable of significance.
Baudrillard suggests the use of Sartreist absurdity to deconstruct capitalism. Therefore, the subject is interpolated into a cultural paradigm of narrative that includes sexuality as a paradox.
Debord uses the term ‘cultural discourse’ to denote the bridge between class and sexual identity. However, many discourses concerning semioticist rationalism may be found.
The characteristic theme of the works of Burroughs is the absurdity, and some would say the defining characteristic, of neomaterialist society. In a sense, Porter holds that we have to choose between cultural discourse and constructive libertarianism.
Uh...Meg, what exactly is your obvious choice? Mr. Anonymous apparently not only has some unresolved childhood issues but current unresolved issues too.
"Semioticist rationalism?" Come on! Not even the great authority - Wikipedia - has an entry about it. Mr. Anonymous take a chill pill.
11 Comments:
At 12:39 PM, John said…
Meg,
The subtle red highlights were not you anyway. You need some hair that will match your personality and make a statement. Have you seen the 1997 film - "The Fifth Element?" Leeloo's hair is for you!
At 12:51 PM, John said…
PS-Stu needs a new hair do too! It needs to make a statement! Ah...He should get a do like Ruby Rhod! Ha..Ha...Haaa!
At 3:55 PM, megumi said…
You know John, if it wasn't for the Southern side of the family I would have gone for the LeeLoo look. I love that movie!!!
As for Stu, I try to get him to spike his hair, but he doesn't like that. He definitely won't go for the Ruby look. Too bad. He could have had herds of Japanese school girls following him.
At 1:06 AM, laurachristel said…
I agree with John. :smile: Hmmm, one can always add, too, fingernails, toenails . . . orange is a great colour!
At 4:36 PM, Stuart said…
Where is your cool do John?
my changing facial hair isn't enough?
At 4:36 PM, Stuart said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
At 7:04 PM, John said…
Stu,
I am insulted. You dare to question the flair and style of the McKenzie do!
If it is a facial hair showdown that you want...my mustache against your goatee.
On guard!
At 9:55 AM, Stuart said…
its on John!
At 7:42 PM, Anonymous said…
Megumi,
You blog entries bring Burroughs and the posttextual paradigm of discourse to mind.
I thought of this because your entries reflect the work of Semioticist rationalism and cultural discourse. As you know, the main theme of Tilton’s essay on semioticist rationalism is a mythopoetical totality. It could be said that the premise of subtextual dedeconstructivism states that culture is capable of significance.
Baudrillard suggests the use of Sartreist absurdity to deconstruct capitalism. Therefore, the subject is interpolated into a cultural paradigm of narrative that includes sexuality as a paradox.
Debord uses the term ‘cultural discourse’ to denote the bridge between class and sexual identity. However, many discourses concerning semioticist rationalism may be found.
The characteristic theme of the works of Burroughs is the absurdity, and some would say the defining characteristic, of neomaterialist society. In a sense, Porter holds that we have to choose between cultural discourse and constructive libertarianism.
Your choice is obvious!
At 2:40 PM, John said…
Uh...Meg, what exactly is your obvious choice? Mr. Anonymous apparently not only has some unresolved childhood issues but current unresolved issues too.
"Semioticist rationalism?" Come on! Not even the great authority - Wikipedia - has an entry about it. Mr. Anonymous take a chill pill.
At 11:46 PM, godgivensmile said…
a do like Ruby Rhod! hahahaha
Post a Comment
<< Home